What did a source report?
An individual report from a publisher, preserved with a link to its source.
NEWS IN CONTEXT
Ten articles may cover one event. Several different events may reveal a larger pattern. Sangraha helps separate repeated reporting from connections worth examining, while keeping the original sources close at hand.
An individual report from a publisher, preserved with a link to its source.
Several articles can cover the same event. A story brings that coverage together into an account you can follow.
A narrative proposes a pattern across several stories. The claim stays connected to its supporting material and the observations that would challenge it.
SEE THE DIFFERENCE
Six reports. Three events. One proposed connection. Follow the example from the original headlines to the claim Sangraha makes across them.
A CLAIM CAN CHANGE
Review can change the wording of a claim. This saved revision shows the actual earlier and later text; it is not a simulated update.
The archive grows as new material arrives. These recorded counts illustrate its scale at the date below, including older accounts and claims.
Loading the recorded snapshot…
— active written narratives and — written narratives across all states were retained at capture.
One event can produce many articles. One narrative can connect several stories. The counts describe different things; they do not measure how accurate the system is.
Sangraha revisits narratives as evidence changes. A claim can be revised, split into more specific claims, or retired. You can inspect its latest recorded assessment alongside the stories it includes.
A narrative in the active collection. This does not mean its claim has been proven.
No fresh evidence for 90 days. A quiet claim is not necessarily wrong.
Removed from the active collection after review or 180 days of inactivity. Its history remains available.
A review is unresolved. This describes the assessment, separately from whether the narrative is active or quiet.
Sources are collected, enriched, and grouped into article clusters. Generated story accounts retain links to their reporting. Narrative formation proposes connections across stories; evidence assessment checks and repairs those claims in bounded batches.
The architecture uses shared identities and typed relationships, inspired by Festival’s heterogeneous relation graphs. Keeping a story in a group is different from establishing that it supports the group’s claim.
The system checks that an assessment still refers to the current evidence before applying it. Exact quotations confirm where words appeared, but do not prove the interpretation. Automatic revival of dormant narratives remains unfinished.